Proposal to extend protection of insurance policy owners

This article is more than 12 months old

A scheme that protects policyholders if their insurer goes belly up may soon be extended to cover private property and vehicles that owners may sometimes use for commercial gain, such as driving for Uber.

The move to broaden the Policy Owners' Protection (PPF) Scheme reflects the trend for people to generate extra cash from their homes or cars.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said yesterday that such people deserve protection under the PPF Scheme, which protects policy owners if a life or general insurer that is a scheme member, fails.

Another key proposal outlined yesterday is to exclude certain high-value property damage claims from protection under the PPF Scheme.

There are now no caps for general insurance policies under the scheme as it provides 100 per cent coverage.

But the MAS noted that unless caps are imposed, the PPF scheme, which has a target fund size of around $32 million, could be exposed to huge payouts.

It cited the risks that claims for damage to an expensive sports car or a high-end residential unit could pose for the PPF.

The MAS proposes to impose a cap of $50,000 for own property damage motor claims, under personal motor insurance policies, and a $300,000 cap for property damage claims, under personal property (structure and contents) insurance policies.

Own property damage motor claims refer to damage inflicted on your car, which is insured under your name.

The MAS said "the caps will help keep PPF levies and insurance premiums affordable for the scheme members and consumers".

"The caps have also been calibrated for the PPF Scheme to fully cover more than 99 per cent of such claims, based on industry data over the past few years," it said.

"The introduction of caps is also aligned with practices in other jurisdictions which have in place similar schemes."

General Insurance Association (GIA) chief executive Derek Teo said: "This is a positive move. Individuals who own cars under their names and use them for hire and rewards will enjoy a wider protection and have an opportunity to recoup their losses, if the insurer goes belly up."

He added that imposing the caps is a "prudent move without which the liability aspect will be astronomical".

A consultation paper has been issued detailing the above proposals. Feedback would need to reach MAS by May 19.

insuranceMonetary Authority of SingaporeFinance