Ex-HDB employee sentenced for taking bribes in 1994

This article is more than 12 months old

He ignored firm's flouting of guidelines in construction of car park barriers

A former Housing Board clerk-of-works who obtained bribes more than 22 years ago in return for being lenient in his supervision of a construction project was jailed for nine months yesterday.

Soh Chor Huang, 65, was also ordered to pay a penalty of $24,800 - the total amount of bribes he received for 11 months in 1994.

He admitted to five counts of receiving $2,400 between March and July 1994 from Mr Chang Chan Nam and Mr Peck Chin Choon of Chang Choon Huat Construction (CCH) as an inducement to be lenient in his supervision of CCH's installation of HDB carpark barriers.

The court heard that CCH was incorporated in 1993 by Mr Chang, Mr Peck and Soh's brother-in-law Goh Teck Seng.

CCH began work in late 1993 on a HDB project to erect barriers to existing parapets of multi-storey carparks, with Soh assigned as the clerk-of-works.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Jasmin Kaur said Soh had planned with Mr Chang and Mr Peck to receive the bribe as a "monthly salary".

A government servant, Soh did not want his name to be registered in the company. He asked his brother-in-law, Mr Goh, to register instead.

Mr Goh agreed, but did not get involved in the company in any other way.


Between January and November 1994, directors' salaries were paid to Mr Chang, Mr Peck and Mr Goh, and 20 per cent of the salaries were credited into their respective Central Provident Fund (CPF) accounts, with the remaining paid in cash or cheque.

For Mr Goh's salary, 20 per cent was credited into his CPF account, and the remaining 80 per cent went to Soh.

DPP Jasmin said Soh was supposed to supervise and ensure that the works followed HDB guidelines.

Soh had noticed on some occasions that CCH neither used HDB-approved materials for installing some of the barriers nor obtained HDB's permission to use other materials.

He did not report these facts to HDB and allowed the works to carry on.

Soh's lawyer, Mr Kelvin Lim, said in his mitigation plea that since the case came to light, Soh's health had deteriorated from the anxiety and uncertainty of the matter.

"Perhaps the greatest pain (Soh) has had to endure is the fact that he has brought shame to his family," he said.

Soh could have been fined up to $100,000 and jailed for up to five years on each charge.